Celeron J3060 vs i3-3227U

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-3227U
2013
2 cores / 4 threads, 17 Watt
0.81
+88.4%
Celeron J3060
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.43

Core i3-3227U outperforms Celeron J3060 by an impressive 88% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-3227U and Celeron J3060 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25892961
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.02
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i3Intel Celeron
Power efficiency4.516.78
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Airmont (2016)
Release date8 January 2013 (11 years ago)15 January 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$225$107

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-3227U and Celeron J3060 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.9 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.9 GHz2.48 GHz
Bus typeno dataIDI
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB
L3 cache3 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size118 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °C90 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-3227U and Celeron J3060 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1023FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-3227U and Celeron J3060. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI-+
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
Smart Responseno data-
Demand Based Switching-no data
GPIOno data+
Smart Connectno data-
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
HD Audiono data+
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Core i3-3227U and Celeron J3060 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Bootno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection++
OS Guardno data-
Anti-Theft+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-3227U and Celeron J3060 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x++
VT-ino data-
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-3227U and Celeron J3060. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3L-1600
Maximum memory size32 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 4000no data
Max video memoryno data8 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHz700 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12
InTru 3D+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-3227U and Celeron J3060 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i3-3227U and Celeron J3060 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data+
OpenGLno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-3227U and Celeron J3060.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes164
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data5
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data5
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-3227U 0.81
+88.4%
Celeron J3060 0.43

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-3227U 1292
+90.3%
Celeron J3060 679

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i3-3227U 301
+65.4%
Celeron J3060 182

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i3-3227U 652
+104%
Celeron J3060 320

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.81 0.43
Recency 8 January 2013 15 January 2016
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 6 Watt

i3-3227U has a 88.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more threads.

Celeron J3060, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 183.3% lower power consumption.

The Core i3-3227U is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J3060 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i3-3227U is a notebook processor while Celeron J3060 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-3227U and Celeron J3060, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-3227U
Core i3-3227U
Intel Celeron J3060
Celeron J3060

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 85 votes

Rate Core i3-3227U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 135 votes

Rate Celeron J3060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-3227U or Celeron J3060, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.