Pentium 4 1.80 vs i3-3217UE
Primary details
Comparing Core i3-3217UE and Pentium 4 1.80 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2552 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 4.77 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Willamette (2000−2001) |
| Release date | 1 August 2012 (12 years ago) | August 2001 (23 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core i3-3217UE and Pentium 4 1.80 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 8 KB |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 256 KB |
| L3 cache | 3 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 180 nm |
| Die size | 118 mm2 | 217 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 78 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 42 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core i3-3217UE and Pentium 4 1.80 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA1023 | 478 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 67 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-3217UE and Pentium 4 1.80. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-3217UE and Pentium 4 1.80 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-3217UE and Pentium 4 1.80. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | unknown Dual-channel | DDR1, DDR2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD 4000 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 180 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 67 Watt |
i3-3217UE has 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 718.2% more advanced lithography process, and 294.1% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core i3-3217UE and Pentium 4 1.80. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Core i3-3217UE is a notebook processor while Pentium 4 1.80 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-3217UE and Pentium 4 1.80, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
