Celeron M 310 vs i3-3217UE
Primary details
Comparing Core i3-3217UE and Celeron M 310 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2555 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Celeron M |
| Power efficiency | 4.79 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Banias (2003) |
| Release date | 1 August 2012 (12 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core i3-3217UE and Celeron M 310 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 400 MHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 3 MB (shared) | 512 KB L2 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 130 nm |
| Die size | 118 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 1.356V |
Compatibility
Information on Core i3-3217UE and Celeron M 310 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | Intel BGA1023 | H-PBGA479, PPGA478 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 24.5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-3217UE and Celeron M 310. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | - |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | - |
| Idle States | no data | - |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| PAE | no data | 32 Bit |
| FSB parity | no data | - |
Security technologies
Core i3-3217UE and Celeron M 310 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-3217UE and Celeron M 310 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-3217UE and Celeron M 310. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | unknown Dual-channel | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD 4000 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 24 Watt |
i3-3217UE has 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 490.9% more advanced lithography process, and 41.2% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core i3-3217UE and Celeron M 310. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-3217UE and Celeron M 310, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
