Ryzen 9 7945HX3D vs i3-2393M
Primary details
Comparing Core i3-2393M and Ryzen 9 7945HX3D processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | 99 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Intel Core i3 | AMD Dragon Range (Zen 4, Ryzen 7045) |
Power efficiency | no data | 62.15 |
Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4) (2023−2024) |
Release date | 14 August 2011 (13 years ago) | 27 July 2023 (1 year ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $50 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Core i3-2393M and Ryzen 9 7945HX3D basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
Threads | 4 | 32 |
Base clock speed | no data | 2.3 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
Bus type | DMI 2.0 | no data |
Bus rate | 4 × 5 GT/s | no data |
Multiplier | 25 | no data |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 512 KB | 1 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | 4 MB | 128 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 5 nm |
Die size | 149 mm2 | 2x 71 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 89 °C |
Number of transistors | 624 Million | 17,840 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Core i3-2393M and Ryzen 9 7945HX3D compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
Socket | Socket G2 | FL1 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 55 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-2393M and Ryzen 9 7945HX3D. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | - | + |
FMA | + | - |
AVX | + | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-2393M and Ryzen 9 7945HX3D are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-2393M and Ryzen 9 7945HX3D. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3-1333 | DDR5-5200 |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 21.335 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel HD Graphics 3000 | AMD Radeon 610M (400 - 2200 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-2393M and Ryzen 9 7945HX3D.
PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 28 |
Pros & cons summary
Integrated graphics card | 0.66 | 2.85 |
Recency | 14 August 2011 | 27 July 2023 |
Physical cores | 2 | 16 |
Threads | 4 | 32 |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 5 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 55 Watt |
i3-2393M has 57.1% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, on the other hand, has 331.8% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 11 years, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 540% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Core i3-2393M and Ryzen 9 7945HX3D. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-2393M and Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.