Celeron M 925 vs i3-2130

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-2130 and Celeron M 925 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	2275	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.15	no data
Market segment	Desktop processor	Laptop
Series	no data	Intel Celeron M
Power efficiency	1.88	no data
Architecture codename	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date	4 September 2011 (13 years ago)	1 January 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$123	$70

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

Core i3-2130 and Celeron M 925 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	1 (Single-Core)
Threads	4	1
Base clock speed	3.4 GHz	no data
Boost clock speed	3.4 GHz	2.3 GHz
Bus rate	5 GT/s	800 MHz
L1 cache	64 KB (per core)	no data
L2 cache	256 KB (per core)	1 MB
L3 cache	3 MB (shared)	no data
Chip lithography	32 nm	45 nm
Die size	131 mm2	107 mm2
Maximum core temperature	no data	105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	73 °C	no data
Number of transistors	504 million	410 Million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-2130 and Celeron M 925 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	no data
Socket	FCLGA1155	PGA478
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-2130 and Celeron M 925. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX	no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	+	no data
Idle States	+	no data
Thermal Monitoring	+	-
Flex Memory Access	+	no data
FDI	+	no data
Fast Memory Access	+	no data

Security technologies

Core i3-2130 and Celeron M 925 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	+	no data
EDB	+	no data
Identity Protection	+	-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-2130 and Celeron M 925 are enumerated here.

VT-d	-	no data
VT-x	+	no data
EPT	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-2130 and Celeron M 925. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	no data
Maximum memory size	32 GB	no data
Max memory channels	2	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	21 GB/s	no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	Intel HD Graphics 2000	no data
Quick Sync Video	+	-
Clear Video HD	+	no data
Graphics max frequency	1.1 GHz	no data
InTru 3D	+	no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-2130 and Celeron M 925 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported

2

no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-2130 and Celeron M 925.

PCIe version	2.0	no data
PCI Express lanes	16	no data

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	4 September 2011	1 January 2011
Physical cores	2	1
Threads	4	1
Chip lithography	32 nm	45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	35 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-2130 and Celeron M 925, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---