i3-330E vs i3-2120

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-2120
2011
2 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
1.26
+55.6%
Core i3-330E
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
0.81

Core i3-2120 outperforms Core i3-330E by an impressive 56% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-2120 and Core i3-330E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking23052606
Place by popularity98not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.14no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Core i3
Power efficiency1.802.15
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Westmere (2010−2011)
Release date20 February 2011 (13 years ago)7 January 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$95$177

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-2120 and Core i3-330E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.3 GHz2.13 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz0.03 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 1.0
Bus rate5 GT/s1 × 2.5 GT/s
Multiplierno data16
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache3 MB (shared)3 MB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size131 mm281 mm2
Maximum core temperature69 °C90 °C for rPGA,105 °C for BGA
Number of transistors504 million382 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-2120 and Core i3-330E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1155BGA1288
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-2120 and Core i3-330E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
FMA-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
PAEno data36 Bit
FDI++
Fast Memory Access++

Security technologies

Core i3-2120 and Core i3-330E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Identity Protection+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-2120 and Core i3-330E are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-2120 and Core i3-330E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-800, DDR3-1066
Maximum memory size32 GB8.79 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/s17.051 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 2000Intel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® Processors
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHz667 MHz
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-2120 and Core i3-330E integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported22

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-2120 and Core i3-330E.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-2120 1.26
+55.6%
i3-330E 0.81

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-2120 1957
+55.3%
i3-330E 1260

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.26 0.81
Recency 20 February 2011 7 January 2010
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

i3-2120 has a 55.6% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.

i3-330E, on the other hand, has 85.7% lower power consumption.

The Core i3-2120 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-330E in performance tests.

Note that Core i3-2120 is a desktop processor while Core i3-330E is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-2120 and Core i3-330E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-2120
Core i3-2120
Intel Core i3-330E
Core i3-330E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 1675 votes

Rate Core i3-2120 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate Core i3-330E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-2120 or Core i3-330E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.