Xeon D-1713NT vs i3-12100F
Primary details
Comparing Core i3-12100F and Xeon D-1713NT processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 859 | not rated |
Place by popularity | 5 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
Power efficiency | 14.49 | no data |
Architecture codename | Alder Lake-S (2022) | no data |
Release date | January 2022 (2 years ago) | 1 January 2022 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core i3-12100F and Xeon D-1713NT basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
Threads | 8 | 8 |
Base clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 4.3 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
L1 cache | 80K (per core) | no data |
L2 cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | no data |
L3 cache | 12 MB (shared) | 10 MB |
Chip lithography | Intel 7 nm | 10 nm |
Die size | 163 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Core i3-12100F and Xeon D-1713NT compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
Socket | FCLGA1700 | FCBGA2227 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 58 Watt | 45 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-12100F and Xeon D-1713NT. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | Intel® AVX-512 |
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | + | - |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
QuickAssist | no data | + |
Speed Shift | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | + |
TSX | + | - |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | + |
Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | - | no data |
Deep Learning Boost | + | + |
Security technologies
Core i3-12100F and Xeon D-1713NT technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | + |
EDB | + | + |
Secure Key | + | no data |
SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® SPS |
OS Guard | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-12100F and Xeon D-1713NT are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | + |
VT-x | + | + |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-12100F and Xeon D-1713NT. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | DDR4 |
Maximum memory size | 128 GB | 256 GB |
Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | no data |
ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-12100F and Xeon D-1713NT.
PCIe version | 5.0 and 4.0 | 4.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 20 | 16 |
USB revision | no data | 3.0 |
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | no data | 24 |
Number of USB ports | no data | 4 |
Integrated LAN | no data | + |
Pros & cons summary
Power consumption (TDP) | 58 Watt | 45 Watt |
Xeon D-1713NT has 28.9% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core i3-12100F and Xeon D-1713NT. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Core i3-12100F is a desktop processor while Xeon D-1713NT is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-12100F and Xeon D-1713NT, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.