Itanium 9540 vs i3-10350K
Primary details
Comparing Core i3-10350K and Itanium 9540 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Architecture codename | Comet Lake (2020) | no data |
| Release date | 30 April 2020 (4 years ago) | 1 October 2012 (12 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core i3-10350K and Itanium 9540 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 4.1 GHz | 2.13 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.8 GHz | no data |
| Bus rate | no data | 6.4 GT/s |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 256K (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | 24 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 32 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 95 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core i3-10350K and Itanium 9540 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | 1200 | LGA1248 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 91 Watt | 170 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-10350K and Itanium 9540. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | + | - |
Security technologies
Core i3-10350K and Itanium 9540 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-10350K and Itanium 9540 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| VT-i | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-10350K and Itanium 9540. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2666 | no data |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-10350K and Itanium 9540.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 30 April 2020 | 1 October 2012 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 8 |
| Threads | 8 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 91 Watt | 170 Watt |
i3-10350K has an age advantage of 7 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 86.8% lower power consumption.
Itanium 9540, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Core i3-10350K and Itanium 9540. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Core i3-10350K is a desktop processor while Itanium 9540 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-10350K and Itanium 9540, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
