EPYC 4344P vs i3-10325

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-10325
2021
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
6.46
EPYC 4344P
2024
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
21.70
+236%

EPYC 4344P outperforms Core i3-10325 by a whopping 236% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-10325 and EPYC 4344P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1048241
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation21.0250.00
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency9.4131.59
Architecture codenameComet Lake-R (2021)Raphael (2023−2024)
Release date16 March 2021 (3 years ago)21 May 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$154$329

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 4344P has 138% better value for money than i3-10325.

Detailed specifications

Core i3-10325 and EPYC 4344P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads816
Base clock speed3.9 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4.7 GHz5.3 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Die sizeno data71 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C61 °C
Number of transistorsno data6,570 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-10325 and EPYC 4344P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1200AM5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-10325 and EPYC 4344P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core i3-10325 and EPYC 4344P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-10325 and EPYC 4344P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-10325 and EPYC 4344P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR5
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth41.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 630AMD Radeon Graphics
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.15 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-10325 and EPYC 4344P integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i3-10325 and EPYC 4344P integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2160@30Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096 x 2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096 x 2304@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i3-10325 and EPYC 4344P integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-10325 and EPYC 4344P.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes1628

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-10325 6.46
EPYC 4344P 21.70
+236%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-10325 10268
EPYC 4344P 34474
+236%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.46 21.70
Integrated graphics card 3.09 1.98
Recency 16 March 2021 21 May 2024
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 8 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm

i3-10325 has 56.1% faster integrated GPU.

EPYC 4344P, on the other hand, has a 235.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 4344P is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-10325 in performance tests.

Note that Core i3-10325 is a desktop processor while EPYC 4344P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-10325 and EPYC 4344P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-10325
Core i3-10325
AMD EPYC 4344P
EPYC 4344P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 12 votes

Rate Core i3-10325 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 4344P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-10325 or EPYC 4344P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.