Xeon Gold 6240R vs i3-10105F

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-10105F
2021
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
5.88
Xeon Gold 6240R
2020
24 cores / 48 threads, 165 Watt
21.79
+271%

Xeon Gold 6240R outperforms Core i3-10105F by a whopping 271% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-10105F and Xeon Gold 6240R processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1130258
Place by popularity56not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data19.25
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataIntel Xeon Gold
Power efficiency8.2512.04
Architecture codenameComet Lake-R (2021)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date16 March 2021 (3 years ago)24 February 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$97$2,200

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-10105F and Xeon Gold 6240R basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads848
Base clock speed3.7 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz4 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rate8 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data24
L1 cache64 KB (per core)1.5 MB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)24 MB
L3 cache6 MB (shared)35.75 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-10105F and Xeon Gold 6240R compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1200FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt165 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-10105F and Xeon Gold 6240R. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0--
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core i3-10105F and Xeon Gold 6240R technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-10105F and Xeon Gold 6240R are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-10105F and Xeon Gold 6240R. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4-2933
Maximum memory size128 GB1 TB
Max memory channels26
Maximum memory bandwidth41.6 GB/s140.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-10105F and Xeon Gold 6240R.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1648

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-10105F 5.88
Xeon Gold 6240R 21.79
+271%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-10105F 8992
Xeon Gold 6240R 33353
+271%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.88 21.79
Recency 16 March 2021 24 February 2020
Physical cores 4 24
Threads 8 48
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 165 Watt

i3-10105F has an age advantage of 1 year, and 153.8% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 6240R, on the other hand, has a 270.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads.

The Xeon Gold 6240R is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-10105F in performance tests.

Note that Core i3-10105F is a desktop processor while Xeon Gold 6240R is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-10105F and Xeon Gold 6240R, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-10105F
Core i3-10105F
Intel Xeon Gold 6240R
Xeon Gold 6240R

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 3570 votes

Rate Core i3-10105F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 10 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6240R on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-10105F or Xeon Gold 6240R, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.