i3-6100E vs i3-10105F

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-10105F
2021
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
5.65
+170%
Core i3-6100E
2015
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
2.09

Core i3-10105F outperforms Core i3-6100E by a whopping 170% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-10105F and Core i3-6100E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking11471892
Place by popularity50not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.24
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Core i3
Power efficiency8.235.65
Architecture codenameComet Lake-R (2021)Skylake (2015−2016)
Release date16 March 2021 (3 years ago)12 October 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$97$225

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-10105F and Core i3-6100E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads84
Base clock speed3.7 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz2.7 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rate8 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data27
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache6 MB (shared)3 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data98.57 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data1750 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-10105F and Core i3-6100E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1200no data
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-10105F and Core i3-6100E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Core i3-10105F and Core i3-6100E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-10105F and Core i3-6100E are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-10105F and Core i3-6100E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666LPDDR3-1866
Maximum memory size128 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth41.6 GB/s34.134 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AIntel HD Graphics 530

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-10105F and Core i3-6100E.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-10105F 5.65
+170%
i3-6100E 2.09

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-10105F 8971
+171%
i3-6100E 3315

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.65 2.09
Recency 16 March 2021 12 October 2015
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 4
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

i3-10105F has a 170.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

i3-6100E, on the other hand, has 85.7% lower power consumption.

The Core i3-10105F is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-6100E in performance tests.

Note that Core i3-10105F is a desktop processor while Core i3-6100E is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-10105F and Core i3-6100E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-10105F
Core i3-10105F
Intel Core i3-6100E
Core i3-6100E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 3664 votes

Rate Core i3-10105F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core i3-6100E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-10105F or Core i3-6100E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.