Athlon X2 QL-65 vs i3-10105F

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-10105F and Athlon X2 QL-65 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1132not rated
Place by popularity56not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno data2x AMD Athlon
Power efficiency8.24no data
Architecture codenameComet Lake-R (2021)Lion (2008−2009)
Release date16 March 2021 (3 years ago)1 September 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$97no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-10105F and Athlon X2 QL-65 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed3.7 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz2.1 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/s3600 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)256 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache6 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm65 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-10105F and Athlon X2 QL-65 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1200S1g2
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-10105F and Athlon X2 QL-65. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX265 nm, 1.075 - 1.125
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
PowerNow-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Core i3-10105F and Athlon X2 QL-65 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-10105F and Athlon X2 QL-65 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-10105F and Athlon X2 QL-65. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666no data
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth41.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-10105F and Athlon X2 QL-65.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-10105F 8993
+1377%
Athlon X2 QL-65 609

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 March 2021 1 September 2009
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

i3-10105F has an age advantage of 11 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon X2 QL-65, on the other hand, has 85.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core i3-10105F and Athlon X2 QL-65. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core i3-10105F is a desktop processor while Athlon X2 QL-65 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-10105F and Athlon X2 QL-65, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-10105F
Core i3-10105F
AMD Athlon X2 QL-65
Athlon X2 QL-65

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 3579 votes

Rate Core i3-10105F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.4 127 votes

Rate Athlon X2 QL-65 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-10105F or Athlon X2 QL-65, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.