EPYC 9255 vs Ultra 9 285K

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core Ultra 9 285K and EPYC 9255 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking49not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation70.90no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency32.79no data
Architecture codenameArrow Lake-S (2024−2025)Turin (2024)
Release date24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$589$2,495

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra 9 285K and EPYC 9255 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads2448
Base clock speed3.7 GHz3.25 GHz
Boost clock speed5.7 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus rate250 MHzno data
L1 cache112 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache3 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache36 MB (shared)128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography3 nm4 nm
Die size243 mm24x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistors17,800 million33,260 million
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 9 285K and EPYC 9255 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
Socket1851SP5
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 9 285K and EPYC 9255. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core Ultra 9 285K and EPYC 9255 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 9 285K and EPYC 9255 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 9 285K and EPYC 9255. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5 Depends on motherboardDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardArc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EUN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 9 285K and EPYC 9255.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes20128

Pros & cons summary


Threads 24 48
Chip lithography 3 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 200 Watt

Ultra 9 285K has a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 60% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9255, on the other hand, has 100% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Core Ultra 9 285K and EPYC 9255. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core Ultra 9 285K is a desktop processor while EPYC 9255 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Ultra 9 285K and EPYC 9255, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
Core Ultra 9 285K
AMD EPYC 9255
EPYC 9255

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 103 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 285K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9255 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Ultra 9 285K or EPYC 9255, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.