Ryzen 5 4600HS vs Ultra 9 285H
Aggregate performance score
Core Ultra 9 285H outperforms Ryzen 5 4600HS by a whopping 137% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen 5 4600HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 256 | 861 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | no data | AMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU) |
| Power efficiency | 44.67 | 24.20 |
| Architecture codename | Arrow Lake-H | Renoir-HS (Zen 2) (2020) |
| Release date | no data | 6 January 2020 (5 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen 5 4600HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.4 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 30 |
| L1 cache | no data | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 8 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | no data | 7 nm |
| Die size | no data | 156 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 9,800 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | + |
Compatibility
Information on Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen 5 4600HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | FP6 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen 5 4600HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen 5 4600HS are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen 5 4600HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4-4266 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 64 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 4 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 68.27 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 1500 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen 5 4600HS.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 21.12 | 8.90 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 6 |
| Threads | 16 | 12 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 35 Watt |
Ultra 9 285H has a 137.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 166.7% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads.
Ryzen 5 4600HS, on the other hand, has 28.6% lower power consumption.
The Core Ultra 9 285H is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 4600HS in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen 5 4600HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
