Athlon 1200 (B) vs Ultra 9 285

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core Ultra 9 285 and Athlon 1200 (B) processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking118not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency25.85no data
Architecture codenameArrow Lake-S (2024−2025)Thunderbird B (2000−2001)
Release dateJanuary 2025 (recently)17 October 2000 (24 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$579$612

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra 9 285 and Athlon 1200 (B) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Performance-cores8no data
Efficient-cores16no data
Threads241
Base clock speed2.5 GHzno data
Boost clock speed5.5 GHz1.2 GHz
L1 cache192 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache3 MB (per core)256 KB
L3 cache36 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography3 nm180 nm
Die size243 mm2120 mm2
Number of transistors17,800 million37 million
64 bit support+-

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 9 285 and Athlon 1200 (B) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1851A
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt66 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 9 285 and Athlon 1200 (B). You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
SIPP+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost+-
Supported AI Software FrameworksOpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN-

Security technologies

Core Ultra 9 285 and Athlon 1200 (B) technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 9 285 and Athlon 1200 (B) are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 9 285 and Athlon 1200 (B). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-6400DDR1 Depends on motherboard
Maximum memory size192 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® GraphicsOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency2 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core Ultra 9 285 and Athlon 1200 (B) integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core Ultra 9 285 and Athlon 1200 (B) integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44K @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 8K @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)no data
Max resolution over eDP4K @ 60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort8K @ 60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core Ultra 9 285 and Athlon 1200 (B) integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 9 285 and Athlon 1200 (B).

PCIe version5.0 and 4.0no data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 24 1
Threads 24 1
Chip lithography 3 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 66 Watt

Ultra 9 285 has 2300% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 5900% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon 1200 (B), on the other hand, has 89.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core Ultra 9 285 and Athlon 1200 (B). We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Ultra 9 285 and Athlon 1200 (B), ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Ultra 9 285
Core Ultra 9 285
AMD Athlon 1200 (B)
Athlon 1200 (B)

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 76 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 285 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Athlon 1200 (B) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Ultra 9 285 or Athlon 1200 (B), agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.