Ryzen 3 210 vs Ultra 7 266V
Primary details
Comparing Core Ultra 7 266V and Ryzen 3 210 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 537 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 77.57 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Lunar Lake (2024) | Hawk Point (2024−2025) |
| Release date | 24 September 2024 (less than a year ago) | 6 January 2025 (recently) |
Detailed specifications
Core Ultra 7 266V and Ryzen 3 210 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Performance-cores | 4 | no data |
| Low Power Efficient-cores | 4 | no data |
| Threads | 8 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5 GHz | 4.7 GHz |
| Bus rate | 37 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 192 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2.5 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 12 MB (shared) | 8 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | no data | 137 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 20,900 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Core Ultra 7 266V and Ryzen 3 210 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FCBGA2833 | FP7 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 7 266V and Ryzen 3 210. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Speed Shift | + | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | + | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | + | - |
| Supported AI Software Frameworks | OpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN | - |
Security technologies
Core Ultra 7 266V and Ryzen 3 210 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
| Secure Key | + | no data |
| OS Guard | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 7 266V and Ryzen 3 210 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 7 266V and Ryzen 3 210. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel Arc Graphics 140V | AMD Radeon 740M |
| Quick Sync Video | + | - |
| Graphics max frequency | 2 GHz | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Core Ultra 7 266V and Ryzen 3 210 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Core Ultra 7 266V and Ryzen 3 210 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL) | no data |
| Max resolution over eDP | 3840x2400 @ 120Hz | no data |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz | no data |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Core Ultra 7 266V and Ryzen 3 210 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | 12.2 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 7 266V and Ryzen 3 210.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 4 | 14 |
| PCI support | 5.0 and 4.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Integrated graphics card | 13.40 | 8.27 |
| Recency | 24 September 2024 | 6 January 2025 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 28 Watt |
Ultra 7 266V has 62% faster integrated GPU, 100% more physical cores, a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 64.7% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 3 210, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 months.
We couldn't decide between Core Ultra 7 266V and Ryzen 3 210. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core Ultra 7 266V and Ryzen 3 210, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
