3 N355 vs Ultra 7 265

Aggregate performance score

Core Ultra 7 265
2025
20 cores / 20 threads, 65 Watt
29.10
+327%

Core Ultra 7 265 outperforms Core 3 N355 by a whopping 327% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core Ultra 7 265 and Core 3 N355 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1571056
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation67.39no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Power efficiency42.64no data
Architecture codenameArrow Lake-S (2024−2025)no data
Release date7 January 2025 (less than a year ago)1 January 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$394no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra 7 265 and Core 3 N355 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores20 (Icosa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Performance-cores8no data
Efficient-cores12no data
Threads208
Base clock speed2.4 GHzno data
Boost clock speed5.3 GHz3.9 GHz
L1 cache112 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache3 MB (per core)no data
L3 cache30 MB (shared)6 MB Intel® Smart Cache
Chip lithography3 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size243 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors17,800 millionno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 7 265 and Core 3 N355 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1851FCBGA1264
Power consumption (TDP)65 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 7 265 and Core 3 N355. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
SIPP+-
GPIOno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost+-
Supported AI Software FrameworksOpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN-

Security technologies

Core Ultra 7 265 and Core 3 N355 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 7 265 and Core 3 N355 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 7 265 and Core 3 N355. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-6400DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR5-4800
Maximum memory size192 GB16 GB
Max memory channels21
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® GraphicsIntel® Graphics
Quick Sync Video++
Graphics max frequency1.95 GHz1.35 GHz
Execution Unitsno data32

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core Ultra 7 265 and Core 3 N355 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported43

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core Ultra 7 265 and Core 3 N355 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44K @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 8K @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)4096 x 2160@60Hz
Max resolution over eDP4K @ 60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort8K @ 60Hz4096 x 2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core Ultra 7 265 and Core 3 N355 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212.1
OpenGL4.54.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 7 265 and Core 3 N355.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.0no data
PCI Express lanes209
USB revisionno data2.0/3.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ultra 7 265 29.10
+327%
3 N355 6.82

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ultra 7 265 46618
+327%
3 N355 10926

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 29.10 6.82
Physical cores 20 8
Threads 20 8

Ultra 7 265 has a 326.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 150% more physical cores and 150% more threads.

The Core Ultra 7 265 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 3 N355 in performance tests.

Note that Core Ultra 7 265 is a desktop processor while Core 3 N355 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Ultra 7 265 and Core 3 N355, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Ultra 7 265
Core Ultra 7 265
Intel Core 3 N355
Core 3 N355

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 12 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 265 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core 3 N355 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Ultra 7 265 or Core 3 N355, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.