E-240 vs Ultra 7 155H

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core Ultra 7 155H
2023
16 cores / 22 threads, 28 Watt
15.82
+13083%

Core Ultra 7 155H outperforms E-240 by a whopping 13083% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core Ultra 7 155H and E-240 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking4333354
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Meteor Lake-HAMD E-Series
Power efficiency53.470.63
Architecture codenameMeteor Lake-H (2023)Zacate (2011−2013)
Release date14 December 2023 (1 year ago)4 January 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$503no data

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra 7 155H and E-240 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads221
Base clock speed3.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.8 GHz1.5 GHz
L1 cache112 KB (per core)64 KB
L2 cache2 MB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache24 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithographyIntel 4 nm40 nm
Die sizeno data75 mm2
Maximum core temperature110 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 7 155H and E-240 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA2049FT1 BGA 413-Ball
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and E-240. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2MMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost+-
Supported AI Software FrameworksOpenVINO™, WindowsML, ONNX RT-

Security technologies

Core Ultra 7 155H and E-240 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and E-240 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and E-240. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR3 Single-channel
Maximum memory size96 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® Arc™ graphicsAMD Radeon HD 6310
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency2.25 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core Ultra 7 155H and E-240 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and E-240 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)no data
Max resolution over eDP3840x2400 @ 120Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and E-240 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.2no data
OpenGL4.6no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and E-240.

PCIe version5.0no data
PCI Express lanes8no data
PCI support5.0 and 4.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ultra 7 155H 15.82
+13083%
E-240 0.12

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ultra 7 155H 25131
+12788%
E-240 195

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Ultra 7 155H 9828
+948%
E-240 938

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Ultra 7 155H 13031
+2504%
E-240 501

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Ultra 7 155H 3.61
+3706%
E-240 137.4

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Ultra 7 155H 30
+11431%
E-240 0

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.82 0.12
Recency 14 December 2023 4 January 2011
Physical cores 16 1
Threads 22 1
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 18 Watt

Ultra 7 155H has a 13083.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, and 1500% more physical cores and 2100% more threads.

E-240, on the other hand, has 55.6% lower power consumption.

The Core Ultra 7 155H is our recommended choice as it beats the E-240 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Ultra 7 155H and E-240, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
Core Ultra 7 155H
AMD E-240
E-240

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 561 vote

Rate Core Ultra 7 155H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 55 votes

Rate E-240 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Ultra 7 155H or E-240, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.