Athlon Silver 3050U vs Ultra 7 155H

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core Ultra 7 155H
2023
16 cores / 22 threads, 28 Watt
15.81
+745%
Athlon Silver 3050U
2020
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
1.87

Core Ultra 7 155H outperforms Athlon Silver 3050U by a whopping 745% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core Ultra 7 155H and Athlon Silver 3050U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking4341993
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Meteor Lake-HAMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)
Power efficiency53.3011.78
Architecture codenameMeteor Lake-H (2023)Dali (Zen) (2020)
Release date14 December 2023 (1 year ago)6 January 2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$503no data

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra 7 155H and Athlon Silver 3050U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads222
Base clock speed3.8 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.8 GHz3.2 GHz
Multiplierno data23
L1 cache112 KB (per core)192 KB
L2 cache2 MB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache24 MB (shared)4 MB
Chip lithography7 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature110 °C95 °C
Number of transistorsno data4500 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 7 155H and Athlon Silver 3050U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketIntel BGA 2049FP5
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Athlon Silver 3050U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core Ultra 7 155H and Athlon Silver 3050U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Athlon Silver 3050U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Athlon Silver 3050U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU ( - 2250 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 2 ( - 1100 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Athlon Silver 3050U.

PCIe version5.03.0
PCI Express lanes812

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ultra 7 155H 15.81
+745%
Athlon Silver 3050U 1.87

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ultra 7 155H 25106
+743%
Athlon Silver 3050U 2977

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ultra 7 155H 12184
+753%
Athlon Silver 3050U 1429

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.81 1.87
Recency 14 December 2023 6 January 2020
Physical cores 16 2
Threads 22 2
Chip lithography 7 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 15 Watt

Ultra 7 155H has a 745.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 700% more physical cores and 1000% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon Silver 3050U, on the other hand, has 86.7% lower power consumption.

The Core Ultra 7 155H is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon Silver 3050U in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Ultra 7 155H and Athlon Silver 3050U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
Core Ultra 7 155H
AMD Athlon Silver 3050U
Athlon Silver 3050U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 595 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 155H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 8056 votes

Rate Athlon Silver 3050U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Ultra 7 155H or Athlon Silver 3050U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.