Xeon E3-1284L v3 vs Ultra 5 135UL
Primary details
Comparing Core Ultra 5 135UL and Xeon E3-1284L v3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | no data | Intel Xeon E3 |
| Architecture codename | Meteor Lake-PS (2024) | Haswell (2013−2015) |
| Release date | 8 April 2024 (less than a year ago) | 1 March 2014 (10 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $331 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Core Ultra 5 135UL and Xeon E3-1284L v3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 14 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 1.6 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 4.4 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | DMI 2.0 |
| Bus rate | no data | 5 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 18 |
| L1 cache | 112 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (per core) | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 12 MB (shared) | 6 MB |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 22 nm |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core Ultra 5 135UL and Xeon E3-1284L v3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | 1851 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 47 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 5 135UL and Xeon E3-1284L v3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| TSX | + | + |
Security technologies
Core Ultra 5 135UL and Xeon E3-1284L v3 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 5 135UL and Xeon E3-1284L v3 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 5 135UL and Xeon E3-1284L v3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 Depends on motherboard | no data |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 32 GB |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Arc Xe-LPG 64EU | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 5 135UL and Xeon E3-1284L v3.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 8 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 8 April 2024 | 1 March 2014 |
| Physical cores | 12 | 4 |
| Threads | 14 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 22 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 47 Watt |
Ultra 5 135UL has an age advantage of 10 years, 200% more physical cores and 75% more threads, a 214.3% more advanced lithography process, and 213.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core Ultra 5 135UL and Xeon E3-1284L v3. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Core Ultra 5 135UL is a desktop processor while Xeon E3-1284L v3 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core Ultra 5 135UL and Xeon E3-1284L v3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
