Celeron 4305UE vs Ultra 5 135H
Aggregate performance score
Core Ultra 5 135H outperforms Celeron 4305UE by a whopping 1235% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core Ultra 5 135H and Celeron 4305UE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 508 | 2427 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Meteor Lake-H | no data |
| Power efficiency | 48.10 | 6.73 |
| Architecture codename | Meteor Lake-H (2023) | Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) |
| Release date | 14 December 2023 (1 year ago) | 1 October 2018 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $342 | $107 |
Detailed specifications
Core Ultra 5 135H and Celeron 4305UE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 18 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 3.6 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 4.6 GHz | 2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 112 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 18 MB (shared) | 2 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 10 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 110 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | + |
Compatibility
Information on Core Ultra 5 135H and Celeron 4305UE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA 2049 | Intel BGA 1528 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 5 135H and Celeron 4305UE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| TSX | + | - |
Security technologies
Core Ultra 5 135H and Celeron 4305UE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 5 135H and Celeron 4305UE are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 5 135H and Celeron 4305UE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel Arc 7-Cores iGPU ( - 2200 MHz) | Intel UHD Graphics 610 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 5 135H and Celeron 4305UE.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 8 | 16 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 14.15 | 1.06 |
| Integrated graphics card | 17.23 | 1.89 |
| Recency | 14 December 2023 | 1 October 2018 |
| Physical cores | 14 | 2 |
| Threads | 18 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 15 Watt |
Ultra 5 135H has a 1234.9% higher aggregate performance score, 811.6% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 5 years, 600% more physical cores and 800% more threads, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron 4305UE, on the other hand, has 86.7% lower power consumption.
The Core Ultra 5 135H is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 4305UE in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core Ultra 5 135H and Celeron 4305UE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
