Ryzen Threadripper 1940X vs Ultra 5 125H

Primary details

Comparing Core Ultra 5 125H and Ryzen Threadripper 1940X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking521not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Meteor Lake-Hno data
Power efficiency47.39no data
Architecture codenameMeteor Lake-H (2023)Zen (2017−2020)
Release date14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)29 July 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$375no data

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra 5 125H and Ryzen Threadripper 1940X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Threads1828
Base clock speed3.6 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz4 GHz
L1 cache112 KB (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache18 MB (shared)32 MB
Chip lithographyIntel 4 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data213 mm2
Maximum core temperature110 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data9,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 5 125H and Ryzen Threadripper 1940X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA2049SP3r2
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 5 125H and Ryzen Threadripper 1940X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Deep Learning Boost+-
Supported AI Software FrameworksOpenVINO™, WindowsML, ONNX RT-

Security technologies

Core Ultra 5 125H and Ryzen Threadripper 1940X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 5 125H and Ryzen Threadripper 1940X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 5 125H and Ryzen Threadripper 1940X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4 Quad-channel
Maximum memory size96 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® Arc™ graphicsno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency2.2 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core Ultra 5 125H and Ryzen Threadripper 1940X integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core Ultra 5 125H and Ryzen Threadripper 1940X integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)no data
Max resolution over eDP3840x2400 @ 120Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core Ultra 5 125H and Ryzen Threadripper 1940X integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.2no data
OpenGL4.6no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 5 125H and Ryzen Threadripper 1940X.

PCIe version5.0no data
PCI Express lanes28no data
PCI support5.0 and 4.0no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 December 2023 29 July 2017
Threads 18 28
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 180 Watt

Ultra 5 125H has an age advantage of 6 years, and 542.9% lower power consumption.

Ryzen Threadripper 1940X, on the other hand, has 55.6% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Core Ultra 5 125H and Ryzen Threadripper 1940X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Core Ultra 5 125H is a notebook processor while Ryzen Threadripper 1940X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Ultra 5 125H and Ryzen Threadripper 1940X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
Core Ultra 5 125H
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1940X
Ryzen Threadripper 1940X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 352 votes

Rate Core Ultra 5 125H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 1940X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Ultra 5 125H or Ryzen Threadripper 1940X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.