Ryzen Threadripper 1956X vs Solo ULV U1300

Primary details

Comparing Core Solo ULV U1300 and Ryzen Threadripper 1956X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Architecture codenameYonah (2005−2006)Zen (2017−2020)
Release dateApril 2006 (18 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core Solo ULV U1300 and Ryzen Threadripper 1956X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads1no data
Boost clock speed1.07 GHz3.2 GHz
L1 cache64 KB128 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB32768 KB
Chip lithography65 nm14 nm
Die size90 mm2no data
Number of transistors151 millionno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Core Solo ULV U1300 and Ryzen Threadripper 1956X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket479SP3r2
Power consumption (TDP)5 Watt125 Watt

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Solo ULV U1300 and Ryzen Threadripper 1956X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Solo ULV U1300 and Ryzen Threadripper 1956X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1DDR4

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 12
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 125 Watt

Solo ULV U1300 has 2400% lower power consumption.

Ryzen Threadripper 1956X, on the other hand, has 1100% more physical cores, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Core Solo ULV U1300 and Ryzen Threadripper 1956X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Core Solo ULV U1300 is a notebook processor while Ryzen Threadripper 1956X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Solo ULV U1300 and Ryzen Threadripper 1956X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Solo ULV U1300
Core Solo ULV U1300
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1956X
Ryzen Threadripper 1956X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Core Solo ULV U1300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 1956X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Solo ULV U1300 or Ryzen Threadripper 1956X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.