Iris Graphics 48 vs Solo U1400

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core Solo U1400 and Iris Graphics 48 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCore SoloIntel Iris Graphics
Architecture codenameYonah (2005−2006)Gen9
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core Solo U1400 and Iris Graphics 48 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)no data
Threads1no data
Base clock speed1.2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.2 GHz0.3 GHz
Bus rate533 MHzno data
L3 cache2 MB L2 KBno data
Chip lithography65 nm14 nm0.014 μm 1.4e-5 mm
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
64 bit support--
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V - 1.1Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core Solo U1400 and Iris Graphics 48 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketPBGA479no data
Power consumption (TDP)6 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Solo U1400 and Iris Graphics 48. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core Solo U1400 and Iris Graphics 48 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Solo U1400 and Iris Graphics 48 are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Solo U1400 and Iris Graphics 48. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Maximum memory sizeno data65,536 MB 67,108,864 KB 68,719,476,736 B 0.0625 TiB 64 GB

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm

Iris Graphics 48 has a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Core Solo U1400 and Iris Graphics 48. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Solo U1400 and Iris Graphics 48, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Solo U1400
Core Solo U1400
Intel Iris Graphics 48
Iris Graphics 48

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 4 votes

Rate Core Solo U1400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.6 5 votes

Rate Iris Graphics 48 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Solo U1400 or Iris Graphics 48, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.