Celeron 887E vs Solo U1300

Primary details

Comparing Core Solo U1300 and Celeron 887E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCore SoloIntel Celeron
Architecture codenameYonah (2005−2006)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core Solo U1300 and Celeron 887E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Base clock speed1.06 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.06 GHz1.5 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 2.0
Bus rate533 MHz4 × 5 GT/s
Multiplierno data15
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cacheno data512 KB
L3 cache2 MB L2 KB2 MB
Chip lithography65 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data131 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data504 Million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V - 1.1Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core Solo U1300 and Celeron 887E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketPBGA479no data
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Solo U1300 and Celeron 887E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

FMA-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core Solo U1300 and Celeron 887E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Solo U1300 and Celeron 887E are enumerated here.

VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Solo U1300 and Celeron 887E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3-1333
Maximum memory sizeno data16 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21.335 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 65 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 17 Watt

Solo U1300 has 183.3% lower power consumption.

Celeron 887E, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Core Solo U1300 and Celeron 887E. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Solo U1300 and Celeron 887E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Solo U1300
Core Solo U1300
Intel Celeron 887E
Celeron 887E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Core Solo U1300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 887E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Solo U1300 or Celeron 887E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.