Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS vs Solo T1300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Core Solo T1300 and Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated285
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesCore Solono data
Power efficiencyno data40.97
Architecture codenameYonah (2005−2006)Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024)
Release dateJanuary 2006 (18 years ago)16 April 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Core Solo T1300 and Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads116
Base clock speed1.66 GHz4 GHz
Boost clock speed1.66 GHz5.2 GHz
Bus rate667 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm4 nm
Die size90 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Number of transistors151 million25,000 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range1.1625V - 1.3Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core Solo T1300 and Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketPPGA478, PBGA479FP7
Power consumption (TDP)27 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Solo T1300 and Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataRyzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core Solo T1300 and Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Solo T1300 and Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Solo T1300 and Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 780M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Solo T1300 and Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Solo T1300 210
Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS 30951
+14639%

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 8
Threads 1 16
Chip lithography 65 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 27 Watt 45 Watt

Solo T1300 has 66.7% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS, on the other hand, has 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 1525% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Core Solo T1300 and Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Core Solo T1300 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Solo T1300 and Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Solo T1300
Core Solo T1300
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS
Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 30 votes

Rate Core Solo T1300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Solo T1300 or Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.