Celeron N4120 vs Solo T1300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Core Solo T1300 and Celeron N4120 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated2099
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCore SoloIntel Gemini Lake
Power efficiencyno data24.62
Architecture codenameYonah (2005−2006)Gemini Lake Refresh (2019)
Release dateJanuary 2006 (18 years ago)4 November 2019 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core Solo T1300 and Celeron N4120 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads14
Base clock speed1.66 GHz1.1 GHz
Boost clock speed1.66 GHz2.6 GHz
Bus rate667 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KBno data
L2 cache2 MB4 MB
L3 cache0 KB4 MB
Chip lithography65 nm14 nm
Die size90 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
Number of transistors151 millionno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range1.1625V - 1.3Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core Solo T1300 and Celeron N4120 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketPPGA478, PBGA479FCBGA1090
Power consumption (TDP)27 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Solo T1300 and Celeron N4120. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2
AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data-
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States-+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Smart Responseno data-
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
GPIOno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core Solo T1300 and Celeron N4120 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Solo T1300 and Celeron N4120 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x-+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Solo T1300 and Celeron N4120. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 600
Max video memoryno data8 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data700 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core Solo T1300 and Celeron N4120 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core Solo T1300 and Celeron N4120 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2160@30Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core Solo T1300 and Celeron N4120 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Solo T1300 and Celeron N4120.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data6
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Solo T1300 210
Celeron N4120 2480
+1081%

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 4
Threads 1 4
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 27 Watt 6 Watt

Celeron N4120 has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 350% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core Solo T1300 and Celeron N4120. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Solo T1300 and Celeron N4120, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Solo T1300
Core Solo T1300
Intel Celeron N4120
Celeron N4120

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 30 votes

Rate Core Solo T1300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 509 votes

Rate Celeron N4120 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Solo T1300 or Celeron N4120, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.