Celeron 3965U vs M-5Y10c

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core M-5Y10c
2014
2 cores / 4 threads, 4 Watt
1.19
+9.2%
Celeron 3965U
2017
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
1.09

Core M-5Y10c outperforms Celeron 3965U by a small 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core M-5Y10c and Celeron 3965U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking23552414
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core MIntel Celeron
Power efficiency22.416.84
Architecture codenameBroadwell-Y (2014)Kaby Lake-U (2017)
Release date27 October 2014 (10 years ago)3 January 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$281$107

Detailed specifications

Core M-5Y10c and Celeron 3965U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed0.8 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0OPI
Bus rateno data4 GT/s
Multiplier822
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size50 mm298.7 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °C100 °C
Number of transistors1300 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core M-5Y10c and Celeron 3965U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1234FCBGA1356,FPBGA1356
Power consumption (TDP)4.5 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core M-5Y10c and Celeron 3965U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
My WiFino data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
Smart Response++
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core M-5Y10c and Celeron 3965U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX-+
Identity Protection+-
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core M-5Y10c and Celeron 3965U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core M-5Y10c and Celeron 3965U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory size16 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s34.134 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 5300Intel HD Graphics 610
Max video memory16 GB32 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency800 MHz900 MHz
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core M-5Y10c and Celeron 3965U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
DVIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core M-5Y10c and Celeron 3965U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.42560x1600@60Hz4096x2304@24Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort2560x1600@60Hz4096x2304@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core M-5Y10c and Celeron 3965U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.2/1212
OpenGL4.34.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core M-5Y10c and Celeron 3965U.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes1210

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

M-5Y10c 1.19
+9.2%
Celeron 3965U 1.09

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

M-5Y10c 1892
+9.2%
Celeron 3965U 1732

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

M-5Y10c 622
+41%
Celeron 3965U 441

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

M-5Y10c 1212
+53.8%
Celeron 3965U 788

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.19 1.09
Integrated graphics card 1.04 1.85
Recency 27 October 2014 3 January 2017
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 15 Watt

M-5Y10c has a 9.2% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more threads, and 275% lower power consumption.

Celeron 3965U, on the other hand, has 77.9% faster integrated GPU, and an age advantage of 2 years.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core M-5Y10c and Celeron 3965U.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core M-5Y10c and Celeron 3965U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core M-5Y10c
Core M-5Y10c
Intel Celeron 3965U
Celeron 3965U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 29 votes

Rate Core M-5Y10c on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 20 votes

Rate Celeron 3965U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core M-5Y10c or Celeron 3965U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.