Xeon Gold 6312U vs Duo T2400

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core Duo T2400
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 31 Watt
0.23
Xeon Gold 6312U
2021
24 cores / 48 threads, 185 Watt
26.65
+11487%

Xeon Gold 6312U outperforms Core Duo T2400 by a whopping 11487% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core Duo T2400 and Xeon Gold 6312U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3190186
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesCore Duono data
Power efficiency0.7013.63
Architecture codenameYonah (2005−2006)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release dateJanuary 2006 (18 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$16no data

Detailed specifications

Core Duo T2400 and Xeon Gold 6312U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads248
Base clock speed1.83 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed1.83 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus rate667 MHzno data
L1 cache0 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm10 nm
Die size90 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data80 °C
Number of transistors151 millionno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range1.1625V - 1.3Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core Duo T2400 and Xeon Gold 6312U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketPPGA478, PBGA479FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt185 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Duo T2400 and Xeon Gold 6312U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core Duo T2400 and Xeon Gold 6312U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Duo T2400 and Xeon Gold 6312U are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Duo T2400 and Xeon Gold 6312U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data6 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Duo T2400 and Xeon Gold 6312U.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data64

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Duo T2400 0.23
Xeon Gold 6312U 26.65
+11487%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Duo T2400 362
Xeon Gold 6312U 42329
+11593%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.23 26.65
Physical cores 2 24
Threads 2 48
Chip lithography 65 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt 185 Watt

Duo T2400 has 496.8% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 6312U, on the other hand, has a 11487% higher aggregate performance score, 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 550% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon Gold 6312U is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Duo T2400 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core Duo T2400 is a notebook processor while Xeon Gold 6312U is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Duo T2400 and Xeon Gold 6312U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Duo T2400
Core Duo T2400
Intel Xeon Gold 6312U
Xeon Gold 6312U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 25 votes

Rate Core Duo T2400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6312U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Duo T2400 or Xeon Gold 6312U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.