K6-2E+/400ATZ vs 7 160UL
Primary details
Comparing Core 7 160UL and K6-2E+/400ATZ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | AMD K6-2+ |
| Architecture codename | Raptor Lake-PS (2024) | K6-III (1999−2000) |
| Release date | 8 April 2024 (less than a year ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core 7 160UL and K6-2E+/400ATZ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 10 (Deca-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 1.8 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 5.2 GHz | 0.4 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | FSB |
| Bus rate | no data | 100 MT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 4.0 |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 64 KB |
| L2 cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 128 KB |
| L3 cache | 12 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 0.18 µm |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core 7 160UL and K6-2E+/400ATZ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | 1700 | Super Socket 7 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 9.5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 7 160UL and K6-2E+/400ATZ. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| PowerNow | - | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
Security technologies
Core 7 160UL and K6-2E+/400ATZ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 7 160UL and K6-2E+/400ATZ are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 7 160UL and K6-2E+/400ATZ. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4, DDR5 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 GB |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 7 160UL and K6-2E+/400ATZ.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 8 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 10 | 1 |
| Threads | 12 | 1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 9 Watt |
7 160UL has 900% more physical cores and 1100% more threads.
K6-2E+/400ATZ, on the other hand, has 66.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core 7 160UL and K6-2E+/400ATZ. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Core 7 160UL is a desktop processor while K6-2E+/400ATZ is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 7 160UL and K6-2E+/400ATZ, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
