Celeron SU2300 vs Core 2 Solo SU3500

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Celeron SU2300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 Solono data
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)no data
Release date1 April 2009 (15 years ago)1 July 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$262no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Celeron SU2300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)no data
Threads1no data
Base clock speed1.3 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.4 GHzno data
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KBno data
L2 cache3 MBno data
L3 cache3 MB1 MB
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Number of transistors410 Millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.05V-1.15Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Celeron SU2300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketBGA956BGA956
Power consumption (TDP)5.5 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Celeron SU2300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Celeron SU2300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Celeron SU2300 are enumerated here.

VT-x++

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2009 1 July 2009
Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 10 Watt

Core 2 Solo SU3500 has 100% lower power consumption.

Celeron SU2300, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 months.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Celeron SU2300. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Celeron SU2300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Solo SU3500
Core 2 Solo SU3500
Intel Celeron SU2300
Celeron SU2300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 9 votes

Rate Core 2 Solo SU3500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 3 votes

Rate Celeron SU2300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Solo SU3500 or Celeron SU2300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.