EPYC 7313 vs Core 2 Quad Q9505

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Quad Q9505
2009
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.37
EPYC 7313
2021
16 cores / 32 threads, 155 Watt
24.61
+1696%

EPYC 7313 outperforms Core 2 Quad Q9505 by a whopping 1696% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Quad Q9505 and EPYC 7313 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2244207
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data17.19
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Power efficiency1.3615.03
Architecture codenameYorkfield (2007−2009)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date2009 (15 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,083

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Quad Q9505 and EPYC 7313 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads432
Base clock speed2.83 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed0.83 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus rate1333 MHzno data
Multiplierno data30
L1 cache64 KB (per core)1 MB
L2 cache6 MB (shared)8 MB
L3 cache6 MB L2 Cache128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm7 nm+
Die size164 mm24x 81 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)71 °Cno data
Number of transistors456 million16,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Quad Q9505 and EPYC 7313 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA775,LGA775SP3
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt155 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q9505 and EPYC 7313. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Quad Q9505 and EPYC 7313 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q9505 and EPYC 7313 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad Q9505 and EPYC 7313. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Quad Q9505 and EPYC 7313.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Quad Q9505 1.37
EPYC 7313 24.61
+1696%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Quad Q9505 2171
EPYC 7313 39091
+1701%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Core 2 Quad Q9505 361
EPYC 7313 1487
+312%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Core 2 Quad Q9505 1062
EPYC 7313 11432
+976%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.37 24.61
Physical cores 4 16
Threads 4 32
Chip lithography 45 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 155 Watt

Core 2 Quad Q9505 has 63.2% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7313, on the other hand, has a 1696.4% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7313 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Quad Q9505 in performance tests.

Note that Core 2 Quad Q9505 is a desktop processor while EPYC 7313 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q9505 and EPYC 7313, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Quad Q9505
Core 2 Quad Q9505
AMD EPYC 7313
EPYC 7313

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 46 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q9505 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 31 vote

Rate EPYC 7313 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Quad Q9505 or EPYC 7313, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.