Core 2 Duo T7300 vs Core 2 Quad Q9400

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Quad Q9400 and Core 2 Duo T7300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2238not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Core 2 Duo
Power efficiency1.33no data
Architecture codenameYorkfield (2007−2009)Merom (2006−2008)
Release dateAugust 2008 (16 years ago)9 May 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$234

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Quad Q9400 and Core 2 Duo T7300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.66 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.67 GHz2 GHz
Bus rate1333 MHz800 MHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB
L2 cache6 MB (shared)4 MB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm65 nm
Die size2x 81 mm2143 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)71 °Cno data
Number of transistors456 million291 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Quad Q9400 and Core 2 Duo T7300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775PBGA479,PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q9400 and Core 2 Duo T7300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching--
FSB parity--

Security technologies

Core 2 Quad Q9400 and Core 2 Duo T7300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q9400 and Core 2 Duo T7300 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad Q9400 and Core 2 Duo T7300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Quad Q9400 2132
+214%
Core 2 Duo T7300 678

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Core 2 Quad Q9400 335
+54.4%
Core 2 Duo T7300 217

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Core 2 Quad Q9400 923
+162%
Core 2 Duo T7300 352

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 35 Watt

Core 2 Quad Q9400 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

Core 2 Duo T7300, on the other hand, has 171.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Quad Q9400 and Core 2 Duo T7300. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core 2 Quad Q9400 is a desktop processor while Core 2 Duo T7300 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q9400 and Core 2 Duo T7300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400
Core 2 Quad Q9400
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300
Core 2 Duo T7300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 1546 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q9400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 118 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T7300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Quad Q9400 or Core 2 Duo T7300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.