EPYC Embedded 3351 vs Core 2 Quad Q9100

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Quad Q9100 and EPYC Embedded 3351 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2330not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesCore 2 QuadAMD EPYC Embedded
Power efficiency2.54no data
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Zen (2017−2020)
Release dateAugust 2008 (16 years ago)21 February 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Quad Q9100 and EPYC Embedded 3351 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads424
Base clock speed2.26 GHz1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2.26 GHz3 GHz
Bus rate1066 MHzno data
Multiplierno data19
L1 cache64 KB96K (per core)
L2 cache6 MB (per die)512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die size2x 107 mm22x 213 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.05V-1.175Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Quad Q9100 and EPYC Embedded 3351 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21 (Uniprocessor)
SocketPGA478AMD BGA SP4r2
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q9100 and EPYC Embedded 3351. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
AMT+no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Quad Q9100 and EPYC Embedded 3351 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q9100 and EPYC Embedded 3351 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad Q9100 and EPYC Embedded 3351. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-2666
Maximum memory sizeno data1 TiB
Max memory channelsno data4
Maximum memory bandwidthno data85.33 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Quad Q9100 and EPYC Embedded 3351.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data64

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 12
Threads 4 24
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 80 Watt

Core 2 Quad Q9100 has 77.8% lower power consumption.

EPYC Embedded 3351, on the other hand, has 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Quad Q9100 and EPYC Embedded 3351. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Core 2 Quad Q9100 is a notebook processor while EPYC Embedded 3351 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q9100 and EPYC Embedded 3351, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Quad Q9100
Core 2 Quad Q9100
AMD EPYC Embedded 3351
EPYC Embedded 3351

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 47 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q9100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC Embedded 3351 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Quad Q9100 or EPYC Embedded 3351, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.