Xeon E3110 vs Core 2 Quad Q9000

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Quad Q9000
2009
4 cores / 4 threads, 45 Watt
0.99
+26.9%

Core 2 Quad Q9000 outperforms Xeon E3110 by a significant 27% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Xeon E3110 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24642620
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Core 2 Quadno data
Power efficiency2.081.14
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)no data
Release date1 January 2009 (15 years ago)1 January 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$348no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Xeon E3110 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)no data
Threads4no data
Base clock speed2 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHzno data
Bus rate1066 MHzno data
L2 cache6 MBno data
L3 cache6 MB L2 Cache6 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C72 °C
Number of transistors410 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.05V-1.175V0.85V-1.3625V

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Xeon E3110 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketPGA478LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Xeon E3110. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switching--
FSB parity--

Security technologies

Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Xeon E3110 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Xeon E3110 are enumerated here.

VT-x++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Quad Q9000 0.99
+26.9%
Xeon E3110 0.78

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Quad Q9000 1575
+26.8%
Xeon E3110 1242

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Core 2 Quad Q9000 274
Xeon E3110 388
+41.6%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Core 2 Quad Q9000 677
+4.5%
Xeon E3110 648

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.99 0.78
Recency 1 January 2009 1 January 2008
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 65 Watt

Core 2 Quad Q9000 has a 26.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 44.4% lower power consumption.

The Core 2 Quad Q9000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E3110 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core 2 Quad Q9000 is a notebook processor while Xeon E3110 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Xeon E3110, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Quad Q9000
Core 2 Quad Q9000
Intel Xeon E3110
Xeon E3110

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.9 533 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q9000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 38 votes

Rate Xeon E3110 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Quad Q9000 or Xeon E3110, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.