Pentium E2180 vs Core 2 Quad Q9000

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Quad Q9000
2009
4 cores / 4 threads, 45 Watt
0.99
+130%

Core 2 Quad Q9000 outperforms Pentium E2180 by a whopping 130% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Pentium E2180 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24642957
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core 2 Quadno data
Power efficiency2.080.63
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)no data
Release date1 January 2009 (15 years ago)1 July 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$348no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Pentium E2180 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)no data
Threads4no data
Base clock speed2 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHzno data
Bus rate1066 MHzno data
L2 cache6 MBno data
L3 cache6 MB L2 Cache1 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography45 nm65 nm
Die size107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C73 °C
Number of transistors410 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.05V-1.175V0.85V-1.5V

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Pentium E2180 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketPGA478LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Pentium E2180. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switching--
FSB parity--

Security technologies

Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Pentium E2180 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Pentium E2180 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-x+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Quad Q9000 0.99
+130%
Pentium E2180 0.43

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Quad Q9000 1575
+131%
Pentium E2180 683

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Core 2 Quad Q9000 274
+28%
Pentium E2180 214

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Core 2 Quad Q9000 677
+95.7%
Pentium E2180 346

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.99 0.43
Recency 1 January 2009 1 July 2007
Chip lithography 45 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 65 Watt

Core 2 Quad Q9000 has a 130.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 44.4% lower power consumption.

The Core 2 Quad Q9000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium E2180 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core 2 Quad Q9000 is a notebook processor while Pentium E2180 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Pentium E2180, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Quad Q9000
Core 2 Quad Q9000
Intel Pentium E2180
Pentium E2180

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.9 533 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q9000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 22 votes

Rate Pentium E2180 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Quad Q9000 or Pentium E2180, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.