Atom CE4130 vs Core 2 Quad Q9000
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Atom CE4130 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2460 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Core 2 Quad | no data |
| Power efficiency | 2.09 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Sodaville (2009) |
| Release date | 1 January 2009 (15 years ago) | 24 September 2009 (15 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $348 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Atom CE4130 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 1066 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 56 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 6 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 6 MB L2 Cache | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | 96 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 410 Million | 47 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 1.05V-1.175V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Atom CE4130 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | PGA478 | Intel BGA 951 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 7 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Atom CE4130. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Atom CE4130 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Atom CE4130 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Atom CE4130. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR2, DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 January 2009 | 24 September 2009 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 7 Watt |
Core 2 Quad Q9000 has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.
Atom CE4130, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 months, and 542.9% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Atom CE4130. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Atom CE4130, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
