Xeon w9-3575X vs Core 2 Quad Q8200s

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Quad Q8200s and Xeon w9-3575X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated30
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data34.04
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiencyno data14.48
Architecture codenameYorkfield (2007−2009)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date18 January 2009 (15 years ago)24 August 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,789

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Quad Q8200s and Xeon w9-3575X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)44
Threads488
Base clock speed2.33 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed0.33 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus rate1333 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB (shared)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB97.5 MB
Chip lithography45 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size2x 82 mm24x 477 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)76 °C79 °C
Number of transistors456 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Quad Q8200s and Xeon w9-3575X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt340 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q8200s and Xeon w9-3575X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
FSB parity-no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core 2 Quad Q8200s and Xeon w9-3575X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q8200s and Xeon w9-3575X are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x-+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad Q8200s and Xeon w9-3575X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Quad Q8200s and Xeon w9-3575X.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data112

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 January 2009 24 August 2024
Physical cores 4 44
Threads 4 88
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 340 Watt

Core 2 Quad Q8200s has 423.1% lower power consumption.

Xeon w9-3575X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 15 years, and 1000% more physical cores and 2100% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Quad Q8200s and Xeon w9-3575X. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core 2 Quad Q8200s is a desktop processor while Xeon w9-3575X is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q8200s and Xeon w9-3575X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200s
Core 2 Quad Q8200s
Intel Xeon w9-3575X
Xeon w9-3575X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 11 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q8200s on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon w9-3575X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Quad Q8200s or Xeon w9-3575X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.