Xeon Platinum 8380 vs Core 2 Quad Q8200

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Quad Q8200
2008
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.12
Xeon Platinum 8380
2021
40 cores / 80 threads, 270 Watt
39.23
+3403%

Xeon Platinum 8380 outperforms Core 2 Quad Q8200 by a whopping 3403% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Xeon Platinum 8380 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking240971
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency1.1213.75
Architecture codenameYorkfield (2007−2009)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release dateAugust 2008 (16 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Xeon Platinum 8380 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)40 (Tetraconta-Core)
Threads480
Base clock speed2.33 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.33 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus rate1333 MHzno data
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache4 MB (shared)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB60 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm10 nm
Die size2x 81 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)71 °C83 °C
Number of transistors456 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Xeon Platinum 8380 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketLGA775FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt270 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Xeon Platinum 8380. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Xeon Platinum 8380 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Xeon Platinum 8380 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x-+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Xeon Platinum 8380. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data6 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Xeon Platinum 8380.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data64

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Quad Q8200 1.12
Xeon Platinum 8380 39.23
+3403%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Quad Q8200 1775
Xeon Platinum 8380 62318
+3411%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.12 39.23
Physical cores 4 40
Threads 4 80
Chip lithography 45 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 270 Watt

Core 2 Quad Q8200 has 184.2% lower power consumption.

Xeon Platinum 8380, on the other hand, has a 3402.7% higher aggregate performance score, 900% more physical cores and 1900% more threads, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon Platinum 8380 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Quad Q8200 in performance tests.

Note that Core 2 Quad Q8200 is a desktop processor while Xeon Platinum 8380 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Xeon Platinum 8380, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200
Core 2 Quad Q8200
Intel Xeon Platinum 8380
Xeon Platinum 8380

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 553 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q8200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 84 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Quad Q8200 or Xeon Platinum 8380, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.