Xeon L5335 vs Core 2 Quad Q8200

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Quad Q8200
2008
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.12
+2.8%
Xeon L5335
2007
4 cores / 4 threads, 50 Watt
1.09

Core 2 Quad Q8200 outperforms Xeon L5335 by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Xeon L5335 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24062412
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.11
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency1.112.05
Architecture codenameYorkfield (2007−2009)Clovertown (2006−2007)
Release dateAugust 2008 (16 years ago)13 August 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$380

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Xeon L5335 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.33 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.33 GHz2 GHz
Bus rate1333 MHzno data
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB (shared)4 MB (per die)
L3 cache0 KB8 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography45 nm65 nm
Die size2x 81 mm22x 143 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)71 °C60 °C
Number of transistors456 million582 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625V1.1V-1.25V

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Xeon L5335 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketLGA775PLGA771
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt50 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Xeon L5335. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Demand Based Switching--
FSB parity--

Security technologies

Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Xeon L5335 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Xeon L5335 are enumerated here.

VT-x-+
EPTno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Xeon L5335. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Quad Q8200 1.12
+2.8%
Xeon L5335 1.09

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Quad Q8200 1775
+2.2%
Xeon L5335 1737

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.12 1.09
Chip lithography 45 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 50 Watt

Core 2 Quad Q8200 has a 2.8% higher aggregate performance score, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon L5335, on the other hand, has 90% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Xeon L5335.

Note that Core 2 Quad Q8200 is a desktop processor while Xeon L5335 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Xeon L5335, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200
Core 2 Quad Q8200
Intel Xeon L5335
Xeon L5335

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 552 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q8200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate Xeon L5335 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Quad Q8200 or Xeon L5335, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.