Pentium G2010 vs Core 2 Quad Q8200
Aggregate performance score
Core 2 Quad Q8200 outperforms Pentium G2010 by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Pentium G2010 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2305 | 2358 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 1.64 | 0.03 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Architecture codename | Yorkfield (2007−2009) | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) |
| Release date | August 2008 (15 years ago) | 21 January 2013 (11 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $466 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Core 2 Quad Q8200 has 5367% better value for money than Pentium G2010.
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Pentium G2010 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.33 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 3072 KB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 22 nm |
| Die size | 2x 81 mm2 | 94 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 71 °C | 65 °C |
| Number of transistors | 456 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Pentium G2010 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 775 | 1155 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 55 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Pentium G2010. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Pentium G2010. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 21 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | no data | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel HD |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Pentium G2010.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Core 2 Quad Q8200 outperforms Pentium G2010 by 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Core 2 Quad Q8200 outperforms Pentium G2010 by 10% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 41%
Pentium G2010 outperforms Core 2 Quad Q8200 by 51% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 41%
Core 2 Quad Q8200 outperforms Pentium G2010 by 29% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.15 | 1.05 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 22 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 55 Watt |
Core 2 Quad Q8200 has a 9.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
Pentium G2010, on the other hand, has a 104.5% more advanced lithography process, and 72.7% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Pentium G2010.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Pentium G2010, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
