Core 2 Quad Q6700 vs Core 2 Quad Q8200

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Quad Q8200
2008
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.12
Core 2 Quad Q6700
2007
4 cores / 4 threads, 105 Watt
1.32
+17.9%

Core 2 Quad Q6700 outperforms Core 2 Quad Q8200 by a moderate 18% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Core 2 Quad Q6700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24092266
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.121.31
Architecture codenameYorkfield (2007−2009)Kentsfield (2007)
Release dateAugust 2008 (16 years ago)April 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Core 2 Quad Q6700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.33 GHz2.66 GHz
Boost clock speed2.33 GHz2.67 GHz
Bus rate1333 MHz1066 MHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache4 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm65 nm
Die size2x 81 mm22x 143 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)71 °C62 °C
Number of transistors456 million582 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625V0.85V-1.5V

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Core 2 Quad Q6700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Core 2 Quad Q6700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Demand Based Switching--
FSB parity--

Security technologies

Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Core 2 Quad Q6700 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Core 2 Quad Q6700 are enumerated here.

VT-x-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Core 2 Quad Q6700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Quad Q8200 1.12
Core 2 Quad Q6700 1.32
+17.9%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Quad Q8200 1775
Core 2 Quad Q6700 2097
+18.1%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Core 2 Quad Q8200 289
Core 2 Quad Q6700 298
+3.1%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Core 2 Quad Q8200 817
Core 2 Quad Q6700 824
+0.9%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.12 1.32
Chip lithography 45 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 105 Watt

Core 2 Quad Q8200 has a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 10.5% lower power consumption.

Core 2 Quad Q6700, on the other hand, has a 17.9% higher aggregate performance score.

The Core 2 Quad Q6700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Quad Q8200 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Core 2 Quad Q6700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200
Core 2 Quad Q8200
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6700
Core 2 Quad Q6700

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 553 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q8200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 144 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q6700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Quad Q8200 or Core 2 Quad Q6700, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.