Core 2 Duo E8435 vs Core 2 Quad Q8200

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Quad Q8200
2008
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.12
+60%
Core 2 Duo E8435
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 44 Watt
0.70

Core 2 Quad Q8200 outperforms Core 2 Duo E8435 by an impressive 60% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Core 2 Duo E8435 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24092725
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Power efficiency1.121.51
Architecture codenameYorkfield (2007−2009)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release dateAugust 2008 (16 years ago)3 March 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Core 2 Duo E8435 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.33 GHz3.067 GHz
Boost clock speed2.33 GHz0.07 GHz
Bus rate1333 MHzno data
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB (shared)6 MB (shared)
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size2x 81 mm2107 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)71 °Cno data
Number of transistors456 million410 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Core 2 Duo E8435 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775P
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt44 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Core 2 Duo E8435. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Core 2 Duo E8435 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Core 2 Duo E8435 are enumerated here.

VT-x-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Core 2 Duo E8435. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR2, DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Quad Q8200 1.12
+60%
Core 2 Duo E8435 0.70

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Quad Q8200 1775
+60.8%
Core 2 Duo E8435 1104

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.12 0.70
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 44 Watt

Core 2 Quad Q8200 has a 60% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Core 2 Duo E8435, on the other hand, has 115.9% lower power consumption.

The Core 2 Quad Q8200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo E8435 in performance tests.

Note that Core 2 Quad Q8200 is a desktop processor while Core 2 Duo E8435 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Core 2 Duo E8435, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200
Core 2 Quad Q8200
Intel Core 2 Duo E8435
Core 2 Duo E8435

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 553 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q8200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core 2 Duo E8435 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Quad Q8200 or Core 2 Duo E8435, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.