Ryzen 3 3100 vs Core 2 Quad Q7600
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Quad Q7600 and Ryzen 3 3100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 974 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 33.70 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | no data | Matisse (Ryzen 3000 Desktop) |
| Power efficiency | no data | 10.93 |
| Architecture codename | Yorkfield (2007−2009) | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) |
| Release date | 31 August 2009 (15 years ago) | 24 April 2020 (4 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $99 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Quad Q7600 and Ryzen 3 3100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 2.7 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.7 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 96K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (shared) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 16 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | 2x 82 mm2 | 74 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 71 °C | 95 °C |
| Number of transistors | 456 million | 3,800 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Quad Q7600 and Ryzen 3 3100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 775 | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q7600 and Ryzen 3 3100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q7600 and Ryzen 3 3100 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad Q7600 and Ryzen 3 3100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Quad Q7600 and Ryzen 3 3100.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 31 August 2009 | 24 April 2020 |
| Threads | 4 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 65 Watt |
Ryzen 3 3100 has an age advantage of 10 years, 100% more threads, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 46.2% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core 2 Quad Q7600 and Ryzen 3 3100. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q7600 and Ryzen 3 3100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
