FX-4150 vs Core 2 Quad Q6700
Aggregate performance score
FX-4150 outperforms Core 2 Quad Q6700 by an impressive 58% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Quad Q6700 and FX-4150 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2246 | 1866 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 1.31 | 2.08 |
| Architecture codename | Kentsfield (2007) | Zambezi (2011−2012) |
| Release date | April 2007 (17 years ago) | 23 October 2012 (12 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Quad Q6700 and FX-4150 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2.66 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.67 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Bus rate | 1066 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 192 KB |
| L2 cache | 8 MB (shared) | 4 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 8 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 2x 143 mm2 | 315 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 62 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 582 million | 1,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
| VID voltage range | 0.85V-1.5V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Quad Q6700 and FX-4150 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | LGA775 | AM3+ |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 105 Watt | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q6700 and FX-4150. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Core 2 Quad Q6700 and FX-4150 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q6700 and FX-4150 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad Q6700 and FX-4150. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | DDR3 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Quad Q6700 and FX-4150.
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.37 | 2.17 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 105 Watt | 95 Watt |
FX-4150 has a 58.4% higher aggregate performance score, a 103.1% more advanced lithography process, and 10.5% lower power consumption.
The FX-4150 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Quad Q6700 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q6700 and FX-4150, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
