Xeon Silver 4216 vs Core 2 Quad Q6600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Quad Q6600
4 cores / 4 threads, 105 Watt
1.19
Xeon Silver 4216
2019
16 cores / 32 threads, 100 Watt
13.47
+1032%

Xeon Silver 4216 outperforms Core 2 Quad Q6600 by a whopping 1032% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 and Xeon Silver 4216 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2367574
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data17.72
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesCore 2 Quad (Desktop)Intel Xeon Silver
Power efficiency1.0312.28
Architecture codenameKentsfield (2007)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)2 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,002

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 and Xeon Silver 4216 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads432
Base clock speedno data2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus rate1066 MHzno data
Multiplierno data21
L1 cacheno data1 MB
L2 cacheno data16 MB
L3 cacheno data22 MB
Chip lithography65 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data79 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 and Xeon Silver 4216 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2 (Multiprocessor)
Socketno dataFCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt100 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 and Xeon Silver 4216. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 and Xeon Silver 4216 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 and Xeon Silver 4216 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 and Xeon Silver 4216. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-2400
Maximum memory sizeno data1 TB
Max memory channelsno data6
Maximum memory bandwidthno data115.212 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 and Xeon Silver 4216.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data48

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Quad Q6600 1.19
Xeon Silver 4216 13.47
+1032%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Quad Q6600 1818
Xeon Silver 4216 20613
+1034%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Core 2 Quad Q6600 269
Xeon Silver 4216 1022
+280%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Core 2 Quad Q6600 767
Xeon Silver 4216 7827
+920%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.19 13.47
Physical cores 4 16
Threads 4 32
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 100 Watt

Xeon Silver 4216 has a 1031.9% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 5% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Silver 4216 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Quad Q6600 in performance tests.

Note that Core 2 Quad Q6600 is a desktop processor while Xeon Silver 4216 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q6600 and Xeon Silver 4216, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600
Core 2 Quad Q6600
Intel Xeon Silver 4216
Xeon Silver 4216

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 1741 vote

Rate Core 2 Quad Q6600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 19 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4216 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Quad Q6600 or Xeon Silver 4216, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.