Opteron X2 280 vs Core 2 Quad Q6600
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 and Opteron X2 280 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2373 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | Core 2 Quad (Desktop) | no data |
| Power efficiency | 1.04 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Kentsfield (2007) | Italy (2005−2006) |
| Release date | no data (2024 years ago) | September 2005 (19 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 and Opteron X2 280 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Bus rate | 1066 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 90 nm |
| Number of transistors | no data | 233 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 and Opteron X2 280 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 2 |
| Socket | no data | 940 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 105 Watt | 95 Watt |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 105 Watt | 95 Watt |
Core 2 Quad Q6600 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.
Opteron X2 280, on the other hand, has 10.5% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core 2 Quad Q6600 and Opteron X2 280. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Core 2 Quad Q6600 is a desktop processor while Opteron X2 280 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q6600 and Opteron X2 280, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
