Core 2 Extreme X6800 vs Core 2 Quad Q6600

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Quad Q6600
2007
4 cores / 4 threads, 105 Watt
1.15
+66.7%
Core 2 Extreme X6800
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 75 Watt
0.69

Core 2 Quad Q6600 outperforms Core 2 Extreme X6800 by an impressive 67% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 and Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) X6800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking23872727
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesCore 2 Quad (Desktop)Core 2 Extreme (Desktop)
Power efficiency1.040.87
Architecture codenameKentsfield (2007)Conroe (2006−2007)
Release dateno datano data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 and Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) X6800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz2.93 GHz
Bus rate1066 MHz1066 MHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache8 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm65 nm
Die size2x 143 mm2143 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)71 °C60 °C
Number of transistors582 million291 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 and Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) X6800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket775775
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt75 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 and Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) X6800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 and Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) X6800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Quad Q6600 1.15
+66.7%
Core 2 Extreme X6800 0.69

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Quad Q6600 1823
+66.5%
Core 2 Extreme X6800 1095

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Core 2 Quad Q6600 2460
Core 2 Extreme X6800 3000
+22%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Core 2 Quad Q6600 8800
+54.4%
Core 2 Extreme X6800 5700

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Core 2 Quad Q6600 3547
+38.1%
Core 2 Extreme X6800 2568

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.15 0.69
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 75 Watt

Core 2 Quad Q6600 has a 66.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Core 2 Extreme X6800, on the other hand, has 40% lower power consumption.

The Core 2 Quad Q6600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Extreme X6800 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q6600 and Core 2 Extreme X6800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600
Core 2 Quad Q6600
Intel Core 2 Extreme X6800
Core 2 Extreme X6800

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 1797 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q6600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 19 votes

Rate Core 2 Extreme X6800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Quad Q6600 or Core 2 Extreme X6800, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.