Core 2 Quad Q9505S vs Core 2 Extreme X6800
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) X6800 and Core 2 Quad Q9505S processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2710 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
Series | Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) | no data |
Power efficiency | 0.87 | no data |
Architecture codename | Conroe (2006−2007) | no data |
Release date | no data (2024 years ago) | 1 July 2009 (15 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) X6800 and Core 2 Quad Q9505S basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
Threads | 2 | no data |
Base clock speed | no data | 2.83 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2.93 GHz | no data |
Bus rate | 1066 MHz | 1333 MHz |
L3 cache | no data | 6 MB L2 Cache |
Chip lithography | 65 nm | 45 nm |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 76 °C |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
VID voltage range | no data | 0.85V-1.3625V |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) X6800 and Core 2 Quad Q9505S compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Socket | no data | LGA775 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) X6800 and Core 2 Quad Q9505S. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
Idle States | no data | + |
Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
Security technologies
Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) X6800 and Core 2 Quad Q9505S technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | + |
EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) X6800 and Core 2 Quad Q9505S are enumerated here.
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | no data | + |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
Chip lithography | 65 nm | 45 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 65 Watt |
Core 2 Quad Q9505S has 100% more physical cores, a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 15.4% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core 2 Extreme X6800 and Core 2 Quad Q9505S. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Extreme X6800 and Core 2 Quad Q9505S, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.