Core 2 Duo P7550 vs Core 2 Extreme X9100

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Extreme X9100
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 44 Watt
1.33
+142%

Core 2 Extreme X9100 outperforms Core 2 Duo P7550 by a whopping 142% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Extreme X9100 and Core 2 Duo P7550 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking21852742
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 ExtremeIntel Core 2 Duo
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date15 July 2008 (16 years ago)1 October 2009 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$851no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Extreme X9100 and Core 2 Duo P7550 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed3.06 GHz2.26 GHz
Bus support1066 MHz1066 MHz
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache6 MB3 MB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size107 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C90 °C
Number of transistors410 Million410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Extreme X9100 and Core 2 Duo P7550 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketSocket PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)44 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Extreme X9100 and Core 2 Duo P7550. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
AMT+no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Extreme X9100 and Core 2 Duo P7550 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Extreme X9100 1.33
+142%
Core 2 Duo P7550 0.55

Core 2 Extreme X9100 outperforms Core 2 Duo P7550 by 142% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Core 2 Extreme X9100 2063
+140%
Core 2 Duo P7550 858

Core 2 Extreme X9100 outperforms Core 2 Duo P7550 by 140% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 41%

Core 2 Extreme X9100 438
+59.9%
Core 2 Duo P7550 274

Core 2 Extreme X9100 outperforms Core 2 Duo P7550 by 60% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 41%

Core 2 Extreme X9100 767
+71.2%
Core 2 Duo P7550 448

Core 2 Extreme X9100 outperforms Core 2 Duo P7550 by 71% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Core 2 Extreme X9100 3834
+57.2%
Core 2 Duo P7550 2439

Core 2 Extreme X9100 outperforms Core 2 Duo P7550 by 57% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Core 2 Extreme X9100 7440
+60.2%
Core 2 Duo P7550 4645

Core 2 Extreme X9100 outperforms Core 2 Duo P7550 by 60% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Core 2 Extreme X9100 2810
+40.2%
Core 2 Duo P7550 2004

Core 2 Extreme X9100 outperforms Core 2 Duo P7550 by 40% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Core 2 Extreme X9100 46
Core 2 Duo P7550 35.6
+29.2%

Core 2 Extreme X9100 outperforms Core 2 Duo P7550 by 29% in wPrime 32.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.33 0.55
Recency 15 July 2008 1 October 2009
Power consumption (TDP) 44 Watt 25 Watt

Core 2 Extreme X9100 has a 141.8% higher aggregate performance score.

Core 2 Duo P7550, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 76% lower power consumption.

The Core 2 Extreme X9100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo P7550 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Extreme X9100 and Core 2 Duo P7550, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Extreme X9100
Core 2 Extreme X9100
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550
Core 2 Duo P7550

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 34 votes

Rate Core 2 Extreme X9100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 14 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo P7550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Extreme X9100 or Core 2 Duo P7550, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.